In this blog, the guys will discuss baseball movies. With the season right around the corner, Matthew and Jason thought it would be fun to review their Top 5 favorite baseball movies, and also hand out some awards while they're at it. So, without further ado, Matthew is going to get this one started.
1. Field of Dreams - This movie is, by far, my favorite baseball movie of all time. Just the thought of bringing some of the greatest ballplayers of all time back from the grave for a game in the middle of a cornfield is breathtaking to me. I love this movie and could watch it over and over.
2. Major League - How can you not love a movie about your favorite team? This one gives hope to all the Cleveland Indians fans in the world who hope that one day they will be able to reach the Championship plateau once again.
3. The Sandlot - I can't begin to tell you how happy I am that I re-discovered this movie in the past couple years. I can remember watching it when I was very young and not really appreciating it then. Then, a few years ago, I had a "Baseball Movie Day" with some friends at Bowling Green and this was one of the movies we watched. I fell in love with it and it has climbed my ranks. This will ALWAYS be in my Top 5!
4. Bull Durham - I almost make this and "The Sandlot" 3A and 3B because I love this movie so much. It's the prototypical baseball movie disguised as a bit of a love story so that guys can get their significant others to watch it with them, plus it's got a ton of subtle humor including a meeting on the mound to discuss that there's "a LOT of shit going on!" Kevin Costner and Tim Robbins work very well together in this classic.
5. Fever Pitch - I like this one because it's based in a lot of fact. You can't tell me that "Ben" didn't exist somewhere before this movie was made. Hell, Jimmy Fallon might even be the basis for this character! His love for the Red Sox is what got him this role and he plays it perfectly: kind of dorky but with an unbridled optimism that keeps him connected with his team. The fact that the ending had to be changed because the Red Sox actually WON the World Series is more reason to watch this movie.
Now for my awards in the following categories.
Best Baseball Comedy - The Bad News Bears (either one) - Walter Matheau and Billy Bob Thornton both play the Buttermaker role amazingly well. Matheau did it best though.
Best Baseball Drama - Hardball - I know, I know, Keanu Reeves meets the Mighty Ducks doesn't sound like the ideal movie but the way he connects with these inner-city kids who only know fear is really great. This is not the "Best Acting" award, just "Best Drama."
Best Baseball Movie for Young Kids - TIE - Rookie of the Year AND Little Big League - Both of these movies give kids a whole lot of power over a Major League team, plus Gary Busey and Timothy Busfield star in them, respectively. Angels in the Outfield was also considered for this award.
Best Baseball Movie for History Buffs - The Babe - This is probably the best portrayal of the real Babe Ruth we will ever see. He was a larger than life person and John Goodman brought it to life with gusto! We also get a short glimpse into Ruth's childhood.
Most Compelling Storyline - The Fan - Robert DeNiro plays a psychotic fan in this Baseball thriller in which he ends up kidnapping his favorite player's (Wesley Snipes) son. How Snipes went from a speedy leadoff hitter in Major League to a power hitter with a size 9 hat in The Fan is anyone's guess!
Worst Baseball Movie - Ed - There were too many options for this award (Summer Catch, Air Bud, 7th Inning Fetch) but a chimp playing baseball is where I draw the line!
Guilty Pleasure Baseball Movie - Major League III: Back to the Minors - It's got Scott Bakula in it for Christ's sake!
Most Underrated Baseball Movie - The Benchwarmers - I also considered this one for Best Comedy but I don't think enough people know how good this movie really is. I like it a lot!
Most Overrated Baseball Movie - The Natural - So many people think that this movie is great and I just don't understand it. This movie took a great book and made it into a mediocre movie.
Best Actor in a Baseball Role - Tom Hanks as Jimmie Dugan in A League of Their Own - It's been said that the character of Dugan was based on Jimmie Foxx. Hanks plays a cantankerous ex-ballplayer turned manager of a Women's professional team used to draw crowds.
1. Field of Dreams - This is not only my favorite baseball movie but also my favorite movie period. It's hard to put into words the way I feel about it but I love it. It's the perfect blend of warm hearted emotion and baseball.
2. Eight Men Out - Here's what I know. I love baseball, I love history, and I hate the Chicago White Sox. This movie has it all. Great historical fact, great baseball action, and the downfall of my most hated major league franchise. Not to mention an all-star cast including the literally immortal Studs Terkel.
3. Major League - This is timeless to anyone from the Cleveland area. It's like the summer equivalent to "A Christmas Story". The characters are perfect and the storyline sums up beautifully the way a Cleveland sports fan feels. It's nice that there is a piece of art that can make us tortured souls of Northeast Ohio laugh at our flaws.
4. 61* - Now I had stated before this blog was written that I wouldn't put any movies from my top 5 into the awards section but I lied. This one will make a later appearance. This movie is THE BEST at capturing real life on screen when it comes to baseball. The whole reason is that the stories came from the source since Billy Crystal and Mickey Mantle were friends. Crystal portrays Roger Maris and Mickey Mantle in a truthful, yet tasteful manner. It's a moving piece and one that I don't think gets enough credit.
5. Fever Pitch - This movie makes you proud to be a baseball fan. It's quite sad the way Jimmy Fallon's character is but they make it okay by giving him a personality and heart. I think that's something that makes the film special and also the real life improbable comeback of the Red Sox. That true event makes this movie a classic.
Now for my awards in the following categories.
Best Baseball Comedy - Bad News Bears - I gotta agree with Matt on this one, although I'm going to stick with the original. Walter Matheau and the cast of kids are hilarious from start to end.
Best Baseball Drama - Bang the Drum Slowly - This is the "Brian's Song" of baseball movies so to say the storyline is original would be ignorant, however, DeNiro gives his usual great performance and makes you fall in love with his character only to be let down in the end. Plenty of highs and lows in this piece.
Best Baseball Movie for Young Kids - Rookie of the Year - I loved it as a kid and I still love it today. It's everything a kid could ask for, playing in the big leagues at the age of 12. I also think the goofy character that is played by Daniel Stern is perfect for kids that watch this movie.
Best Baseball Movie for History Buffs - 61* - I disqualified Ken Burns' "Baseball" because it's more of a mini series than a movie so I went with 61*. This gets in depth with the people that were making history and as anyone into history will tell you, the more you can know about the people the more interesting the events are.
Most Compelling Storyline - For Love of the Game - This movie has a lot going on for one character. Kevin Costner is an aging star pitcher who is dealing with an ailing body, the loss of a love he wants back, and in the middle of it all he is throwing a perfect game at Yankee Stadium. This is one of those movies you could almost forget it's about baseball just because the story of this main character has you wrapped up in his personal life. I think it was very well done.
Worst Baseball Movie - Mr. 3000 - Pretty much the only baseball movie that I liked NOTHING about. That's saying something.
Guilty Pleasure Baseball Movie - Major League 2 - I guess it's really not that big of a guilty pleasure but I'm pretty sure that outside of Indians fans most people think this movie is lame. I mean it does have the stereotypical sequel feel where they throw together a flaky storyline and bring back everyone just to make some money again. I mean Omar Epps plays Wesley Snipes as Willie Mays Hayes and nobody even cared. Whenever that happens and you like it then it's probably a bad movie. And I do like the movie.
Most Underrated Baseball Movie - Cobb - It seems like this movie is never mentioned when talking about baseball movies and it's probably because it's technically not about baseball it's about a baseball player. Ty Cobb, in my opinion, is one of the most interesting characters in baseball history because of his volatile personality and the heartbreaking life behind it. This movie captures that heartache and gives you a new perspective on this misunderstood man.
Most Overrated Baseball Movie - The Natural - Listen...the rightfielder dies after running into the wall. That is how Redford becomes a star. I mean come on...really? And this movie is classic? I can't understand it. I think the homerun into the light fixture scene is great but that's it.
Best Actor in a Baseball Role - TIE - Gary Cooper as Lou Gehrig in "Pride of the Yankees" and John Turturro as Billy Martin in "The Bronx is Burning" - I had to give this award to a legendary actor in a legendary role. The Lou Gehrig story is epic in the baseball world and Gary Cooper does an excellent job in this old classic. I'm not sure that Bronx qualifies as a "movie" because it was shown on ESPN in parts but I do know it's available in full on DVD so I figured that was a movie in my book. Turturro was amazing in this role and I think he is a very good and under appreciated actor in today's Hollywood circle. I was not around when Billy Martin was in the majors but I've seen plenty of videos and it was eerie how well Turturro was able to capture the fire on the field of Martin as well as the tortured soul off the field. This is a must see for all baseball fans.
So what do you think? What are your favorite movies? Do you agree with the guys, think they've completely missed a great movie or have suggestions for other awards? Let them hear it!
Thursday, March 25, 2010
Friday, February 26, 2010
MLB Season Preview
This week the Heads or Tails guys give us their Major League Baseball Season Preview. As always, Jason writes in brown and Matthew writes in orange. Jason will start us off with his National League East predictions followed by Matthew's and then the same way through all the divisions.
Jason's NL EAST
1. Atlanta
2. Philadelphia
3. New York
4. Florida
5. Washington
Right out of the gate I am picking a dark horse. I think most people will favor the defending NL champion Phillies but I think the Braves quietly made some of the biggest and most impactful off-season moves. Their rotation is anchored by veterans Derek Lowe and Tim Hudson then are followed up by two up and comers Jair Jurrjens and Tommy Hanson. That's a solid 4 right there. Plus they added Billy Wagner and Takashi Saito (who has a career ERA of 2.05 and a career WHIP of 1.01). In the field they brought in Melky Cabrera and Troy Glaus. Moving Glaus to first base is huge because it will lessen his chance of injury and give him a chance to shine at the plate. Look for the Braves to surprise a lot of people and add another division title to their resume.
Matthew's NL EAST
1. Philadelphia
2. Atlanta
3. Florida
4. Washington
5. New York
I think this is going to be an important year in the NL East where we will see the Nationals NOT finish in the cellar and the Mets hit rock bottom. The Braves will definitely compete in this division but going up against a great Phillies team anchored by Roy Halladay will not be an easy task. I don't like the Braves one bit but I hope this year is successful enough for Bobby Cox to get to the playoffs with his boys one more time. I respect the hell out of that man and what he's done in his two decades of managing. I am under the impression that the National's fan (I think there's just one) will get to see Stephen Strasburg jump to the bigs some time in June and he will make a nice impact on a club that has really had nothing go right in it's short (new) existence.
Jason's NL CENTRAL
1. Chicago
2. St. Louis
3. Cincinnati
4. Houston
5. Milwaukee
6. Pittsburgh
This division seems wide open. I think Milwaukee and Pittsburgh are bottom feeders. Pittsburgh isn't a surprise but Milwaukee's decline is. They have lost their entire starting infield except for Prince Fielder and their pitching staff is suspect. The rest could go in any order. I look for Cincinnati to make strides this season. They have a good young core that is starting to blossom. I think it is likely they hit but the question mark lies within the starting rotation. They have 3 up and coming pitchers in Johnny Cueto, Edinson Volquez, and Homer Bailey. If at least 2 of those 3 can produce this season I look for them to contend. I'm not impressed by either the Cubs or Cardinals but they both always seem to win. The Cubs lineup looks better this year but their staff still has big question marks. I'm picking them to capture the division solely on that batting order.
Matthew's NL CENTRAL
1. St. Louis
2. Cincinnati
3. Chicago
4. Milwaukee
5. Houston
6. Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh will almost definitely continue their near-two decade string of futility and finish at the bottom of the Central. As for the upper echelon of the division, I think St. Louis will take the crown this year. I see the Cubs taking a couple steps back this year but I wouldn't be surprised to see them make a couple trades during the season to make a push after the All-Star Break. You can't bet against a team managed by Tony LaRussa and a batting order that includes the leagues best hitter, Albert Pujols. I think the Reds will beat out the Cubs for the number two spot in the division because of their pitching. I think the same three that you mentioned will be the hinge on which the Reds swing into that spot. When new pitchers come in with good stuff, there is an adjustment period for the rest of the league and it will take a little while for the National League to really learn these pitchers.
Jason's NL WEST
1. Los Angeles
2. San Francisco
3. San Diego
4. Colorado
5. Arizona
It may look like a "gimme" for the Dodgers because they seem to have the best talent overall but do not sleep on the Giants. The bottom 3 look to stay there simply because they are all very young and very inexperienced. Colorado seems to streak but I don't think they have enough talent this year to make a run. San Diego has a nice core of young talent that I think will put them at the top of the bottom feeders but I'd be surprised if they finished any better than .500. Los Angeles' lineup is intimidating and I would even say puts them as the favorites to win the league. Their rotation is not too shabby either with Billingsley, Kershaw, and Kuroda. However, when it comes to rotations, at least in this division, it gets no better than San Francisco's. Lincecum is a freak. Cain is only a notch below him. Zito is not the stud he once was but he is smart and can still get the job done. Then there's #4 Jonathan Sanchez who threw a no hitter last season. If this team can find a way to score runs I think they steal one from the mighty Dodgers but that is a big "if". Keep an eye on this "sleeping giant" in 2010.
Matthew's NL WEST
1. San Francisco
2. Los Angeles
3. San Diego
4. Colorado
5. Arizona
The Rockies will NOT, I repeat, will NOT make another Cinderella run like they have the last couple years. Changing managers in the middle of the season will not work again. The Rockies will be what they are supposed to be: a 4th place team. I disagree with you, once again Jason, about the winner of this division. Led by a, borderline, great rotation the Giants are the team to beat. Lincecum is looking to join Greg Maddux and Randy Johnson as the only players in history to win the Cy Young Award for three consecutive seasons (They each did it four times). Do you see anything stopping him? I don't. Unless Roy Halladay completely outperforms him with the Phillies, this award is Lincecum's to lose. The Dodgers don't impress me very much. You have some aging talent and I think they are going to rely a little too much on Manny Ramirez. Matt Kemp is the key if the Dodgers want to win the West this year. The team will go as he goes.
Jason's AL EAST
1. New York
2. Boston
3. Baltimore
4. Tampa Bay
5. Toronto
The beast in the east is still New York. Boston is of course right there with them. I feel sorry for the Orioles because I really think they have turned their team around but it will most likely go unnoticed due to the dominance of the Yankees and Red Sox. I will say that in about 2 or 3 years if the Orioles can keep their young core in tact they might just make a push similar to that of the Rays of 2008. This season though it will be a two horse race. I say the Yankees win it simply on momentum. I do think their staff is better than Boston's but their lineup is surprisingly...mediocre. However, I don't think that's a bad thing. The Yanks always try to bomb teams out of the yard but this season they added guys like Curtis Granderson and Nick Johnson who will add balance to the team's power.
Matthew's AL EAST
1. New York
2. Boston
3. Tampa Bay
4. Baltimore
5. Toronto
I really hate that the Yankees winning the East is the first thing we're going to agree on. But, it is what it is. The Yankees have the best team that money can buy, and they always will. However, they play the games for a reason. If they didn't, I'd pick the Indians to win the whole thing every year and be a much happier person. I wish that I could agree with you about the Orioles. They have a good nucleus to build around but they are definitely a couple seasons away from seriously contending in the division. Boston doesn't impress me much anymore. Jacoby Ellsbury, Dustin Pedroia and Josh Beckett can only carry them so far. Daisuke and Lester are wild cards every year and I honestly wouldn't be surprised to see the Rays come in second but right now, I have to go with Boston in the two spot.
Jason's AL CENTRAL
1. Chicago
2. Minnesota
3. Kansas City
4. Detroit
5. Cleveland
I hate to say it but the White Sox look tough. Real tough. They made a number of moves this off-season including adding speedster Juan Pierre, power hitter Andruw Jones, and former Royal Mark Teahen. That coupled with a strong staff of Jake Peavy, Mark Buehrle, Gavin Floyd, John Danks, and Freddy Garcia make them not only a favorite to win the division but most likely a front runner for the league. I still think the Yankees and Red Sox are better but with their mid-season wars between one another I wouldn't be surprised to see the Pale Hose sneak into the World Series this year. Trust me, I hope I'm wrong.
Matthew's AL Central
1. Kansas City
2. Chicago
3. Detroit
4. Minnesota
5. Cleveland
This is it. This is the year of the Royals. Zack Greinke has proven that he is a beast and he will anchor a rotation that has the potential to be very, very good. My one concern with the Royals is Scott Podsednik in left field. I really think he's in KC for a veteran presence to help out the young guys. Yuniesky Betancourt is scary and I think this will be a breakout year for him. The addition of Rick Ankiel will prove to be very important, in my opinion. This team reminds me a lot of the Rays that made it to the World Series: a group of young guys that nobody really expects a lot out of. Do not sleep on this team!
Jason's AL WEST
1. Seattle
2. Los Angeles
3. Texas
4. Oakland
This is my American League "dark horse" pick. At first glance I was ready to once again crown the Angels West champs but I couldn't ignore the improvements in Seattle. They added speedster Chone Figgins to the mix and he figures to combine with Ichiro to give Seattle a potent 1-2 punch at the top. With the emergence of Franklin Gutierrez and the addition of Milton Bradley this team will have a solid middle. Say what you want about Bradley but the guy can hit (just not in Chicago). "Junior" Griffey decided to give it another go and I think he will have a decent year. He will DH and I think he can add some pop towards the lower half of the order. They also made a couple silent moves with the addition of Casey Kotchman and Ryan Garko, which figure to platoon at first base. Both players are solid hitters and give the Mariners even more pop. The biggest move the Mariners made this off-season was adding former AL Cy Young winner Cliff Lee. He's a one year rental but that just adds to the fact that the Mariners want to win this year. Lee and Felix Hernandez give Seattle as good a 1-2 combo as any in baseball. Look for Seattle to ride these horses all the way to the playoffs.
Matthew's AL WEST
1. Seattle
2. Los Angeles
3. Oakland
4. Texas
I have to agree with everything you said about the Mariners. This team looks absolutely phenomenal on paper. I mean, even the Indians won with this team (Cliff, Garko, Gutierrez)! The additions of Figgins for offense and Lee for pitching are definitely the clinchers. Ichiro will have another 200 hit season, Lee will dominate the West along with Felix and this team may compete for the best record in the American League when it's all said and done. The Angels look weak to me and have lost a lot of the pieces that made them great the last few years. Sorry Rally Monkey, your time has come to an end.
So there you have it. Lots of disagreement between the two predictions and they could both be completely wrong! Get ready for a great season of Major League Baseball!
Jason's NL EAST
1. Atlanta
2. Philadelphia
3. New York
4. Florida
5. Washington
Right out of the gate I am picking a dark horse. I think most people will favor the defending NL champion Phillies but I think the Braves quietly made some of the biggest and most impactful off-season moves. Their rotation is anchored by veterans Derek Lowe and Tim Hudson then are followed up by two up and comers Jair Jurrjens and Tommy Hanson. That's a solid 4 right there. Plus they added Billy Wagner and Takashi Saito (who has a career ERA of 2.05 and a career WHIP of 1.01). In the field they brought in Melky Cabrera and Troy Glaus. Moving Glaus to first base is huge because it will lessen his chance of injury and give him a chance to shine at the plate. Look for the Braves to surprise a lot of people and add another division title to their resume.
Matthew's NL EAST
1. Philadelphia
2. Atlanta
3. Florida
4. Washington
5. New York
I think this is going to be an important year in the NL East where we will see the Nationals NOT finish in the cellar and the Mets hit rock bottom. The Braves will definitely compete in this division but going up against a great Phillies team anchored by Roy Halladay will not be an easy task. I don't like the Braves one bit but I hope this year is successful enough for Bobby Cox to get to the playoffs with his boys one more time. I respect the hell out of that man and what he's done in his two decades of managing. I am under the impression that the National's fan (I think there's just one) will get to see Stephen Strasburg jump to the bigs some time in June and he will make a nice impact on a club that has really had nothing go right in it's short (new) existence.
Jason's NL CENTRAL
1. Chicago
2. St. Louis
3. Cincinnati
4. Houston
5. Milwaukee
6. Pittsburgh
This division seems wide open. I think Milwaukee and Pittsburgh are bottom feeders. Pittsburgh isn't a surprise but Milwaukee's decline is. They have lost their entire starting infield except for Prince Fielder and their pitching staff is suspect. The rest could go in any order. I look for Cincinnati to make strides this season. They have a good young core that is starting to blossom. I think it is likely they hit but the question mark lies within the starting rotation. They have 3 up and coming pitchers in Johnny Cueto, Edinson Volquez, and Homer Bailey. If at least 2 of those 3 can produce this season I look for them to contend. I'm not impressed by either the Cubs or Cardinals but they both always seem to win. The Cubs lineup looks better this year but their staff still has big question marks. I'm picking them to capture the division solely on that batting order.
Matthew's NL CENTRAL
1. St. Louis
2. Cincinnati
3. Chicago
4. Milwaukee
5. Houston
6. Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh will almost definitely continue their near-two decade string of futility and finish at the bottom of the Central. As for the upper echelon of the division, I think St. Louis will take the crown this year. I see the Cubs taking a couple steps back this year but I wouldn't be surprised to see them make a couple trades during the season to make a push after the All-Star Break. You can't bet against a team managed by Tony LaRussa and a batting order that includes the leagues best hitter, Albert Pujols. I think the Reds will beat out the Cubs for the number two spot in the division because of their pitching. I think the same three that you mentioned will be the hinge on which the Reds swing into that spot. When new pitchers come in with good stuff, there is an adjustment period for the rest of the league and it will take a little while for the National League to really learn these pitchers.
Jason's NL WEST
1. Los Angeles
2. San Francisco
3. San Diego
4. Colorado
5. Arizona
It may look like a "gimme" for the Dodgers because they seem to have the best talent overall but do not sleep on the Giants. The bottom 3 look to stay there simply because they are all very young and very inexperienced. Colorado seems to streak but I don't think they have enough talent this year to make a run. San Diego has a nice core of young talent that I think will put them at the top of the bottom feeders but I'd be surprised if they finished any better than .500. Los Angeles' lineup is intimidating and I would even say puts them as the favorites to win the league. Their rotation is not too shabby either with Billingsley, Kershaw, and Kuroda. However, when it comes to rotations, at least in this division, it gets no better than San Francisco's. Lincecum is a freak. Cain is only a notch below him. Zito is not the stud he once was but he is smart and can still get the job done. Then there's #4 Jonathan Sanchez who threw a no hitter last season. If this team can find a way to score runs I think they steal one from the mighty Dodgers but that is a big "if". Keep an eye on this "sleeping giant" in 2010.
Matthew's NL WEST
1. San Francisco
2. Los Angeles
3. San Diego
4. Colorado
5. Arizona
The Rockies will NOT, I repeat, will NOT make another Cinderella run like they have the last couple years. Changing managers in the middle of the season will not work again. The Rockies will be what they are supposed to be: a 4th place team. I disagree with you, once again Jason, about the winner of this division. Led by a, borderline, great rotation the Giants are the team to beat. Lincecum is looking to join Greg Maddux and Randy Johnson as the only players in history to win the Cy Young Award for three consecutive seasons (They each did it four times). Do you see anything stopping him? I don't. Unless Roy Halladay completely outperforms him with the Phillies, this award is Lincecum's to lose. The Dodgers don't impress me very much. You have some aging talent and I think they are going to rely a little too much on Manny Ramirez. Matt Kemp is the key if the Dodgers want to win the West this year. The team will go as he goes.
Jason's AL EAST
1. New York
2. Boston
3. Baltimore
4. Tampa Bay
5. Toronto
The beast in the east is still New York. Boston is of course right there with them. I feel sorry for the Orioles because I really think they have turned their team around but it will most likely go unnoticed due to the dominance of the Yankees and Red Sox. I will say that in about 2 or 3 years if the Orioles can keep their young core in tact they might just make a push similar to that of the Rays of 2008. This season though it will be a two horse race. I say the Yankees win it simply on momentum. I do think their staff is better than Boston's but their lineup is surprisingly...mediocre. However, I don't think that's a bad thing. The Yanks always try to bomb teams out of the yard but this season they added guys like Curtis Granderson and Nick Johnson who will add balance to the team's power.
Matthew's AL EAST
1. New York
2. Boston
3. Tampa Bay
4. Baltimore
5. Toronto
I really hate that the Yankees winning the East is the first thing we're going to agree on. But, it is what it is. The Yankees have the best team that money can buy, and they always will. However, they play the games for a reason. If they didn't, I'd pick the Indians to win the whole thing every year and be a much happier person. I wish that I could agree with you about the Orioles. They have a good nucleus to build around but they are definitely a couple seasons away from seriously contending in the division. Boston doesn't impress me much anymore. Jacoby Ellsbury, Dustin Pedroia and Josh Beckett can only carry them so far. Daisuke and Lester are wild cards every year and I honestly wouldn't be surprised to see the Rays come in second but right now, I have to go with Boston in the two spot.
Jason's AL CENTRAL
1. Chicago
2. Minnesota
3. Kansas City
4. Detroit
5. Cleveland
I hate to say it but the White Sox look tough. Real tough. They made a number of moves this off-season including adding speedster Juan Pierre, power hitter Andruw Jones, and former Royal Mark Teahen. That coupled with a strong staff of Jake Peavy, Mark Buehrle, Gavin Floyd, John Danks, and Freddy Garcia make them not only a favorite to win the division but most likely a front runner for the league. I still think the Yankees and Red Sox are better but with their mid-season wars between one another I wouldn't be surprised to see the Pale Hose sneak into the World Series this year. Trust me, I hope I'm wrong.
Matthew's AL Central
1. Kansas City
2. Chicago
3. Detroit
4. Minnesota
5. Cleveland
This is it. This is the year of the Royals. Zack Greinke has proven that he is a beast and he will anchor a rotation that has the potential to be very, very good. My one concern with the Royals is Scott Podsednik in left field. I really think he's in KC for a veteran presence to help out the young guys. Yuniesky Betancourt is scary and I think this will be a breakout year for him. The addition of Rick Ankiel will prove to be very important, in my opinion. This team reminds me a lot of the Rays that made it to the World Series: a group of young guys that nobody really expects a lot out of. Do not sleep on this team!
Jason's AL WEST
1. Seattle
2. Los Angeles
3. Texas
4. Oakland
This is my American League "dark horse" pick. At first glance I was ready to once again crown the Angels West champs but I couldn't ignore the improvements in Seattle. They added speedster Chone Figgins to the mix and he figures to combine with Ichiro to give Seattle a potent 1-2 punch at the top. With the emergence of Franklin Gutierrez and the addition of Milton Bradley this team will have a solid middle. Say what you want about Bradley but the guy can hit (just not in Chicago). "Junior" Griffey decided to give it another go and I think he will have a decent year. He will DH and I think he can add some pop towards the lower half of the order. They also made a couple silent moves with the addition of Casey Kotchman and Ryan Garko, which figure to platoon at first base. Both players are solid hitters and give the Mariners even more pop. The biggest move the Mariners made this off-season was adding former AL Cy Young winner Cliff Lee. He's a one year rental but that just adds to the fact that the Mariners want to win this year. Lee and Felix Hernandez give Seattle as good a 1-2 combo as any in baseball. Look for Seattle to ride these horses all the way to the playoffs.
Matthew's AL WEST
1. Seattle
2. Los Angeles
3. Oakland
4. Texas
I have to agree with everything you said about the Mariners. This team looks absolutely phenomenal on paper. I mean, even the Indians won with this team (Cliff, Garko, Gutierrez)! The additions of Figgins for offense and Lee for pitching are definitely the clinchers. Ichiro will have another 200 hit season, Lee will dominate the West along with Felix and this team may compete for the best record in the American League when it's all said and done. The Angels look weak to me and have lost a lot of the pieces that made them great the last few years. Sorry Rally Monkey, your time has come to an end.
So there you have it. Lots of disagreement between the two predictions and they could both be completely wrong! Get ready for a great season of Major League Baseball!
Friday, February 12, 2010
NBA All-Star Weekend
This week's blog will zero in on the NBA All-Star weekend that is coming up on February 13the and 14th. First the predictions for All-Star Saturday.
I'll skip over the WNBA/NBA shooting game because that is not worth predicting. The Rookie/Sophomore game always turns into a run-n-gun alley hoop fest but nonetheless I think it's going to be a romp by the sophomore team. With a team that looks like a future all-star roster (Beasley, Gordon, Rose, Mayo, Love) I think they will put this game out of reach early to the point that you may be able to catch a quick nap before the "real" events take place. The H.O.R.S.E. competition is fairly new to the all-star festivities. I think it's a good idea but they always get young guys to do it since veterans couldn't care less. I'm still hoping to see Larry Bird and Michael Jordan continue their battle from the mid-90s. Anyway, I don't know who will win because they haven't announced the participants but I'm sure it will be with a lame, unoriginal shot and nobody will care. Next is the Skills Competition. Again, the competitors have yet to be determined but this event is usually pretty entertaining and usually has at least 1 superstar in the mix. I'm hoping LeBron or Kobe compete. Last year's winner was Derrick Rose, I would expect a similar guy to win this year. It favors the quick guys who can shoot AND pass. Brandon Jennings is a guy I think would do well in this event. He's a rookie from Milwaukee and he is having a breakout season. The 3-point shootout has always been my favorite event on All-Star Saturday but the last few years have lacked the big name guys. It is nice to see guys like Craig Hodges, Steve Kerr, and more recently Jason Kapono get some exposure though. The field hasn't been announced yet but I'm looking for J.J. Reddick to get in this year and win it. As for the Slam Dunk contest the field consists of defending champion Nate Robinson, Gerald Wallace, Shannon Brown and Dunk-In winner (Eric Gordon or DeMar DeRozan). The dunk in winner is new this year. The contestants are less than spectacular so I'm rooting for Eric Gordon to get in and give the field at least a semi-recognizable name. If Nate Robinson wins again I will stop watching all together. My money is on Gerald Wallace. He is pretty exciting but seems to get the "I've never heard of you" biased. Then there's the big event on Sunday, the NBA All-Star game. Here are the rosters:
East All-Stars
Starters:
Kevin Garnett - PF (Boston)
LeBron James - SF (Cleveland)
Dwight Howard - C (Orlando)
Dwyane Wade - SG (Miami)
Allen Iverson - PG (Philadelphia)
Reserves:
Al Horford - C (Atlanta)
Chris Bosh - PF (Toronto)
Paul Pierce - SF (Boston)
Gerald Wallace - SF (Charlotte)
Joe Johnson - SG (Atlanta)
Rajon Rando - PG (Boston)
Derrick Rose - PG (Chicago)
You could always go on forever about who should be there and who shouldn't when talking about the NBA since the rosters are so small. I'll hold my claims to one each. First off, it's clear as day to see what player should not be there. Allen Iverson does not deserve to be on the team let alone a starter. Reward a Michael Jordan, reward a Magic Johnson, but Iverson is NOT in that class. He was whining about playing time and has been detrimental to teams for years because of his selfish behavior. Not to mention his votes were gained by being on the West ballot anyways. Replace him with Josh Smith. Atlanta already has 2 all-stars but they are winning this year and deserve the extra guy. Besides, he's their best all around player. You could also make a case for David Lee but he plays for the Knicks so I think it's ok that he didn't make it.
West All-Stars
Starters:
Tim Duncan - PF (San Antonio)
Carmelo Anthony - SF (Denver)
Amar'e Stoudamire - C (Phoenix)
Kobe Bryant - SG (L.A. Lakers)
Steve Nash - PG (Phoenix)
Reserves:
Pau Gasol - C (L.A. Lakers)
Dirk Nowitzki - PF (Dallas)
Zach Randolph - PF (Memphis)
Kevin Durant - SF (Oklahoma City)
Brandon Roy - SG (Portland)
Deron Williams - PG (Utah)
Chris Paul - PG (New Orleans)
In the West there isn't that big neon sign of "I Don't Belong" hanging on anyone. However, I think the snub is clear. Los Angeles Clipper center Chris Kaman should be on this team. He's having a career year and it's easy to put him on the team in place of center Pau Gasol, who's missed quite a few games due to injury anyway.
My 3-point shootout winner = Stephen Curry
Skills competition winner = Steve Nash
You want to add a THIRD Hawk to the roster when the Cavs, who have the best record in the NBA, only have LeBron James representing them??? Anderson Varejao, who should be at the top of the list when it comes to Defensive Player and 6th Man of the year, is having an awesome season. J.J. Hickson has come on very strong as of late too! Luckily, Allen Iverson has been replaced because of his injury but was replaced with David Lee of the Knicks. Really? The Knicks have an All-Star? And what about Shaq? No, he's not putting up his 20-10-2(Blocks) but he is a HUGE reason (Pun intended) that the Cavs are the best team in the NBA. I do feel, however, that if Mo Williams were not injured, he would have been a replacement for one of the injured All-Stars.
Kobe's out for the West now too. It seems to me that nothing should stop LeBron from being the All-Star Game MVP this year, in front of the largest ever crowd to witness a basketball game. It's expected that 80,000+ will be in "Look at me! I'm Jerry Jones!" Stadium to see this year's All-Star game, shattering the record for most people at a basketball game. The only downside to this could be a Neutral Floor Finals in the NBA's future which, in my opinion, would ruin the game completely.
As for the skills competition, the dunk competition and the three-point shootout, I predict Dr. J shows up and wins all three. Either him or Magic. But definitely not Barkley. I don't think he can jump anymore. Too many $5 Boxes from Taco Bell.
I can get behind Shaq, he has come on strong since starting very slow. Varejao is good but he's a bench guy. Not that he doesn't deserve it but the fact of the matter is it's LeBron and gang. A bunch of no names (besides Mo and Shaq). The Hawks' players are up and coming STARS. In the NBA, due to the lack of roster spots, you have to earn your way in. If Varejao finishes the year strong then comes out next year and plays just as well then I think he gets more consideration. Now it won't bother me if we put the whole Cavs roster in the all-star game but now it's official and David Lee is in. Can you really be upset that a guy who averages a double-double a night and hustles his ass off for a piss poor team like the Knicks gets the nod? The NBA needs more guys like David Lee.
That's a good point. I think we can be done with basketball until the playoffs now. Spring Training starts next week!
I'll skip over the WNBA/NBA shooting game because that is not worth predicting. The Rookie/Sophomore game always turns into a run-n-gun alley hoop fest but nonetheless I think it's going to be a romp by the sophomore team. With a team that looks like a future all-star roster (Beasley, Gordon, Rose, Mayo, Love) I think they will put this game out of reach early to the point that you may be able to catch a quick nap before the "real" events take place. The H.O.R.S.E. competition is fairly new to the all-star festivities. I think it's a good idea but they always get young guys to do it since veterans couldn't care less. I'm still hoping to see Larry Bird and Michael Jordan continue their battle from the mid-90s. Anyway, I don't know who will win because they haven't announced the participants but I'm sure it will be with a lame, unoriginal shot and nobody will care. Next is the Skills Competition. Again, the competitors have yet to be determined but this event is usually pretty entertaining and usually has at least 1 superstar in the mix. I'm hoping LeBron or Kobe compete. Last year's winner was Derrick Rose, I would expect a similar guy to win this year. It favors the quick guys who can shoot AND pass. Brandon Jennings is a guy I think would do well in this event. He's a rookie from Milwaukee and he is having a breakout season. The 3-point shootout has always been my favorite event on All-Star Saturday but the last few years have lacked the big name guys. It is nice to see guys like Craig Hodges, Steve Kerr, and more recently Jason Kapono get some exposure though. The field hasn't been announced yet but I'm looking for J.J. Reddick to get in this year and win it. As for the Slam Dunk contest the field consists of defending champion Nate Robinson, Gerald Wallace, Shannon Brown and Dunk-In winner (Eric Gordon or DeMar DeRozan). The dunk in winner is new this year. The contestants are less than spectacular so I'm rooting for Eric Gordon to get in and give the field at least a semi-recognizable name. If Nate Robinson wins again I will stop watching all together. My money is on Gerald Wallace. He is pretty exciting but seems to get the "I've never heard of you" biased. Then there's the big event on Sunday, the NBA All-Star game. Here are the rosters:
East All-Stars
Starters:
Kevin Garnett - PF (Boston)
LeBron James - SF (Cleveland)
Dwight Howard - C (Orlando)
Dwyane Wade - SG (Miami)
Allen Iverson - PG (Philadelphia)
Reserves:
Al Horford - C (Atlanta)
Chris Bosh - PF (Toronto)
Paul Pierce - SF (Boston)
Gerald Wallace - SF (Charlotte)
Joe Johnson - SG (Atlanta)
Rajon Rando - PG (Boston)
Derrick Rose - PG (Chicago)
You could always go on forever about who should be there and who shouldn't when talking about the NBA since the rosters are so small. I'll hold my claims to one each. First off, it's clear as day to see what player should not be there. Allen Iverson does not deserve to be on the team let alone a starter. Reward a Michael Jordan, reward a Magic Johnson, but Iverson is NOT in that class. He was whining about playing time and has been detrimental to teams for years because of his selfish behavior. Not to mention his votes were gained by being on the West ballot anyways. Replace him with Josh Smith. Atlanta already has 2 all-stars but they are winning this year and deserve the extra guy. Besides, he's their best all around player. You could also make a case for David Lee but he plays for the Knicks so I think it's ok that he didn't make it.
West All-Stars
Starters:
Tim Duncan - PF (San Antonio)
Carmelo Anthony - SF (Denver)
Amar'e Stoudamire - C (Phoenix)
Kobe Bryant - SG (L.A. Lakers)
Steve Nash - PG (Phoenix)
Reserves:
Pau Gasol - C (L.A. Lakers)
Dirk Nowitzki - PF (Dallas)
Zach Randolph - PF (Memphis)
Kevin Durant - SF (Oklahoma City)
Brandon Roy - SG (Portland)
Deron Williams - PG (Utah)
Chris Paul - PG (New Orleans)
In the West there isn't that big neon sign of "I Don't Belong" hanging on anyone. However, I think the snub is clear. Los Angeles Clipper center Chris Kaman should be on this team. He's having a career year and it's easy to put him on the team in place of center Pau Gasol, who's missed quite a few games due to injury anyway.
My 3-point shootout winner = Stephen Curry
Skills competition winner = Steve Nash
You want to add a THIRD Hawk to the roster when the Cavs, who have the best record in the NBA, only have LeBron James representing them??? Anderson Varejao, who should be at the top of the list when it comes to Defensive Player and 6th Man of the year, is having an awesome season. J.J. Hickson has come on very strong as of late too! Luckily, Allen Iverson has been replaced because of his injury but was replaced with David Lee of the Knicks. Really? The Knicks have an All-Star? And what about Shaq? No, he's not putting up his 20-10-2(Blocks) but he is a HUGE reason (Pun intended) that the Cavs are the best team in the NBA. I do feel, however, that if Mo Williams were not injured, he would have been a replacement for one of the injured All-Stars.
Kobe's out for the West now too. It seems to me that nothing should stop LeBron from being the All-Star Game MVP this year, in front of the largest ever crowd to witness a basketball game. It's expected that 80,000+ will be in "Look at me! I'm Jerry Jones!" Stadium to see this year's All-Star game, shattering the record for most people at a basketball game. The only downside to this could be a Neutral Floor Finals in the NBA's future which, in my opinion, would ruin the game completely.
As for the skills competition, the dunk competition and the three-point shootout, I predict Dr. J shows up and wins all three. Either him or Magic. But definitely not Barkley. I don't think he can jump anymore. Too many $5 Boxes from Taco Bell.
I can get behind Shaq, he has come on strong since starting very slow. Varejao is good but he's a bench guy. Not that he doesn't deserve it but the fact of the matter is it's LeBron and gang. A bunch of no names (besides Mo and Shaq). The Hawks' players are up and coming STARS. In the NBA, due to the lack of roster spots, you have to earn your way in. If Varejao finishes the year strong then comes out next year and plays just as well then I think he gets more consideration. Now it won't bother me if we put the whole Cavs roster in the all-star game but now it's official and David Lee is in. Can you really be upset that a guy who averages a double-double a night and hustles his ass off for a piss poor team like the Knicks gets the nod? The NBA needs more guys like David Lee.
That's a good point. I think we can be done with basketball until the playoffs now. Spring Training starts next week!
Tuesday, January 5, 2010
The NFL Playoffs Predictions
Jason and Matt have each done the due diligence of selecting the winners of each and every playoff game. Here are their takes! Remember, Jason in Brown and Matt in Orange.
Starting in the AFC. New York @ Cincinnati
Baltimore @ New England
I think New York takes care of Cincinnati again. Their defense is playing at its peak and their running game is tough to contain. In the other matchup I'll go with New England. I think this game will be close and even though the Pats are without star receiver Wesley Welker they will still find a way to get it done.
Divisional
New York @ Indianapolis
New England @ San Diego
The Colts will take care of business in this game but I do think they will come out rusty. After resting for 3 weeks they will need to be sharp if they want to beat a hot Jets team. Home field advantage will play to their favor. The other game will be close but I think San Diego will pull away at the end. The Chargers are arguably the hottest team in the league right now and the Pats are banged up. Chargers prevail.
Conference Championship
San Diego @ Indianapolis
I originally had Indy going to the Super Bowl. I still think they can but it's hard to go against the Chargers at this point. I think Rivers and company keep up the torrid pace right into Miami. San Diego wins the AFC.
Now over to the NFC.
Wild CardPhiladelphia @ Dallas
Green Bay @ Arizona
I would normally go against Dallas any year but not this one. They are having a rare hot streak at the end of the year and they are also playing at home. Dallas moves on. On the opposite side, Arizona the state is hot but the football team is ice cold. Green Bay has been playing great all year and their defense is coming together nicely. Rodgers will take advantage of the Cards banged up secondary and move the Packers into the next round.
Divisional
Green Bay @ New Orleans
Dallas @ Minnesota
New Orleans seemed like the mid-season favorite and then fizzled like a cheap bottle rocket. Green Bay is a team I view as a dark horse and I think they will squeak one out in the Bayou. Minnesota and Dallas may be the best game of the playoffs. Both teams are good, both teams are hot, and both teams are hungry. Vikings have too many weapons and will prevail.
Conference Championship
Green Bay @ Minnesota
Logic would tell me to pick Minnesota, however, I know how Brett Favre is. I would never count on him to win a big game. Minnesota beat up on Green Bay in the regular season. Rodgers gets his revenge this time. Green Bay goes to the show.
Super Bowl
Green Bay vs. San Diego
Not what you would call a "glamour" matchup but it will be one that is tight all the way through. It's really hard for me to make a pick with these two, in fact I would expect it to go to OT. I will stick with my pick from earlier in the year and say Green Bay gets another Lombardi Trophy. Aaron Rodgers also solidifies his tenure in Green Bay and puts the Favre legend to rest once and for all.
Wow, going against your Colts. I am shocked!
Here's my predictions.
AFC
New York @ Cincinnati
I don't think the Jets can handle the real Bengals. Cinci played very "vanilla" so they didn't tip their hand to New York last weekend. The Bengals should roll in this one, especially due to the fact that the Jets have a rookie quarterback getting his first taste of the post season.
Baltimore @ New England
This game is really a coin flip with Welker not playing. It's a classic game of Offense vs. Defense and you know what they say, defense wins championships. Combine that with the fact that Ray Rice and Joe Flacco are playing great and I see the Ravens taking the win and moving on to the next round.
"The Next Round"
Baltimore @ Indianapolis
Peyton Manning and the Colts should be able to handle the Ravens in this game. Dallas Clark and Reggie Wayne both got to the 100 reception mark this season and there is no reason they won't manhandle the Ravens secondary. I know, I know, the Ravens defense got them to this game but Indy moves on to the AFC Championship anyways.
Cincinnati @ San Diego
The Chargers are a team possessed and they will not be stopped by the Bengals. Philip Rivers, Antonio Gates and Vincent Jackson will be the reasons that San Diego comes out on top in this game, setting them up for a showdown with the Colts.
AFC Championship Game
San Diego @ Indianapolis
This is another game that could go either way. If this game was in San Diego, I would pick the Super Chargers but Indianapolis is at home and they will not be denied a trip to the big game in Miami. I see Joseph Addai having a huge game as the Chargers will be expecting Peyton to try and beat them with his arm.
Time for the NFC.
Philadelphia @ Dallas
Last week, Philly got shutout in the Jerry Jones Shrine and, while they won't get shut-out again, I don't see them faring much better this time around. Dallas is playing out of their mind and Tony Romo is out to prove that he is a superstar quarterback. This game will help cement that, and also Wade Phillips' job for another year.
Green Bay @ Arizona
Last week, Green Bay beat the snot out of the Matt Leinart led Cardinals. This week, the Cardinals will have Kurt Warner at the helm but the result will be the same. Green Bay is playing as strong as they have all season and the offensive line is finally protecting Aaron Rodgers. Look for Donald Driver to have one oh his best games, ever.
"The Next Round"
Green Bay @ New Orleans
The Saints have looked pedestrian over the past few weeks. The Packers have looked like Champions. Green Bay wins on the road, in the SuperDome and punches their ticket for a spot in the NFC Championship Game. This one will be won on the ground for the Packers. They did it through the air in the first round but Ryan Grant carries the team in this one.
Dallas @ Minnesota
Brett Favre's comeback comes to an end. Tony Romo is still jacked from the week before and gets the job done in this one with a game winning score by Jason Witten to seal the deal. The Old Gun Slinger can't handle the pressure that the 'Boys bring down after down and Adrian Peterson can't convince him to hand him the damn ball.
NFC Championship Game
Green Bay @ Dallas
Late in the season the Packers took down the Cowboys. Unfortunately, and it pains me to say it, the Cowboys get a little payback in this one. They use the same tenacious "D" they did against the Vikings to shut down the Packers passing game. Aaron Rodgers tries too hard and ends up throwing a few picks, which is completely out of the norm for him. Dallas uses the "Yankee Formula" to win. Get a new Stadium, win games.
Super Bowl
Indianapolis vs. Dallas
Tony Romo has tried so hard to make a name for himself and prove himself as a superstar in the National Football League. This is the year he actually does it. Dallas comes out firing on all cylinders and puts Indy on their heels for the entire game. The Cowboys get up by a couple scores early forcing Peyton to beat them with his arm. Once Dallas knows what is coming, the secondary shuts the Colts down and, while they do get back in it and keep it close, the Cowboys win this game by a slim margin, 31-27.
Starting in the AFC. New York @ Cincinnati
Baltimore @ New England
I think New York takes care of Cincinnati again. Their defense is playing at its peak and their running game is tough to contain. In the other matchup I'll go with New England. I think this game will be close and even though the Pats are without star receiver Wesley Welker they will still find a way to get it done.
Divisional
New York @ Indianapolis
New England @ San Diego
The Colts will take care of business in this game but I do think they will come out rusty. After resting for 3 weeks they will need to be sharp if they want to beat a hot Jets team. Home field advantage will play to their favor. The other game will be close but I think San Diego will pull away at the end. The Chargers are arguably the hottest team in the league right now and the Pats are banged up. Chargers prevail.
Conference Championship
San Diego @ Indianapolis
I originally had Indy going to the Super Bowl. I still think they can but it's hard to go against the Chargers at this point. I think Rivers and company keep up the torrid pace right into Miami. San Diego wins the AFC.
Now over to the NFC.
Wild CardPhiladelphia @ Dallas
Green Bay @ Arizona
I would normally go against Dallas any year but not this one. They are having a rare hot streak at the end of the year and they are also playing at home. Dallas moves on. On the opposite side, Arizona the state is hot but the football team is ice cold. Green Bay has been playing great all year and their defense is coming together nicely. Rodgers will take advantage of the Cards banged up secondary and move the Packers into the next round.
Divisional
Green Bay @ New Orleans
Dallas @ Minnesota
New Orleans seemed like the mid-season favorite and then fizzled like a cheap bottle rocket. Green Bay is a team I view as a dark horse and I think they will squeak one out in the Bayou. Minnesota and Dallas may be the best game of the playoffs. Both teams are good, both teams are hot, and both teams are hungry. Vikings have too many weapons and will prevail.
Conference Championship
Green Bay @ Minnesota
Logic would tell me to pick Minnesota, however, I know how Brett Favre is. I would never count on him to win a big game. Minnesota beat up on Green Bay in the regular season. Rodgers gets his revenge this time. Green Bay goes to the show.
Super Bowl
Green Bay vs. San Diego
Not what you would call a "glamour" matchup but it will be one that is tight all the way through. It's really hard for me to make a pick with these two, in fact I would expect it to go to OT. I will stick with my pick from earlier in the year and say Green Bay gets another Lombardi Trophy. Aaron Rodgers also solidifies his tenure in Green Bay and puts the Favre legend to rest once and for all.
Wow, going against your Colts. I am shocked!
Here's my predictions.
AFC
New York @ Cincinnati
I don't think the Jets can handle the real Bengals. Cinci played very "vanilla" so they didn't tip their hand to New York last weekend. The Bengals should roll in this one, especially due to the fact that the Jets have a rookie quarterback getting his first taste of the post season.
Baltimore @ New England
This game is really a coin flip with Welker not playing. It's a classic game of Offense vs. Defense and you know what they say, defense wins championships. Combine that with the fact that Ray Rice and Joe Flacco are playing great and I see the Ravens taking the win and moving on to the next round.
"The Next Round"
Baltimore @ Indianapolis
Peyton Manning and the Colts should be able to handle the Ravens in this game. Dallas Clark and Reggie Wayne both got to the 100 reception mark this season and there is no reason they won't manhandle the Ravens secondary. I know, I know, the Ravens defense got them to this game but Indy moves on to the AFC Championship anyways.
Cincinnati @ San Diego
The Chargers are a team possessed and they will not be stopped by the Bengals. Philip Rivers, Antonio Gates and Vincent Jackson will be the reasons that San Diego comes out on top in this game, setting them up for a showdown with the Colts.
AFC Championship Game
San Diego @ Indianapolis
This is another game that could go either way. If this game was in San Diego, I would pick the Super Chargers but Indianapolis is at home and they will not be denied a trip to the big game in Miami. I see Joseph Addai having a huge game as the Chargers will be expecting Peyton to try and beat them with his arm.
Time for the NFC.
Philadelphia @ Dallas
Last week, Philly got shutout in the Jerry Jones Shrine and, while they won't get shut-out again, I don't see them faring much better this time around. Dallas is playing out of their mind and Tony Romo is out to prove that he is a superstar quarterback. This game will help cement that, and also Wade Phillips' job for another year.
Green Bay @ Arizona
Last week, Green Bay beat the snot out of the Matt Leinart led Cardinals. This week, the Cardinals will have Kurt Warner at the helm but the result will be the same. Green Bay is playing as strong as they have all season and the offensive line is finally protecting Aaron Rodgers. Look for Donald Driver to have one oh his best games, ever.
"The Next Round"
Green Bay @ New Orleans
The Saints have looked pedestrian over the past few weeks. The Packers have looked like Champions. Green Bay wins on the road, in the SuperDome and punches their ticket for a spot in the NFC Championship Game. This one will be won on the ground for the Packers. They did it through the air in the first round but Ryan Grant carries the team in this one.
Dallas @ Minnesota
Brett Favre's comeback comes to an end. Tony Romo is still jacked from the week before and gets the job done in this one with a game winning score by Jason Witten to seal the deal. The Old Gun Slinger can't handle the pressure that the 'Boys bring down after down and Adrian Peterson can't convince him to hand him the damn ball.
NFC Championship Game
Green Bay @ Dallas
Late in the season the Packers took down the Cowboys. Unfortunately, and it pains me to say it, the Cowboys get a little payback in this one. They use the same tenacious "D" they did against the Vikings to shut down the Packers passing game. Aaron Rodgers tries too hard and ends up throwing a few picks, which is completely out of the norm for him. Dallas uses the "Yankee Formula" to win. Get a new Stadium, win games.
Super Bowl
Indianapolis vs. Dallas
Tony Romo has tried so hard to make a name for himself and prove himself as a superstar in the National Football League. This is the year he actually does it. Dallas comes out firing on all cylinders and puts Indy on their heels for the entire game. The Cowboys get up by a couple scores early forcing Peyton to beat them with his arm. Once Dallas knows what is coming, the secondary shuts the Colts down and, while they do get back in it and keep it close, the Cowboys win this game by a slim margin, 31-27.
Friday, December 11, 2009
The Heisman Debate
The Heisman Trophy presentation is Saturday night and the finalists are Mark Ingram, Colt McCoy, Tim Tebow, Toby Gerhart and Ndamukong Suh. Jason and Matthew will debate who they think should win the Heisman. Joining them as a special guest in this blog will be Nick Carbonaro. His words will be in Blue.
I feel that the award should go to Stanford's Toby Gerhart. Not only does he lead the nation in Carries,Yards and Touchdowns, he's also averaging over 5.5 yards per carry. The numbers don't lie and Toby Gerhart should be striking the pose Saturday evening.
In my opinion all of the candidates are worthy of a shot at the Heisman but the one who stands out the most for me is Mark Ingram. I think what is special about this award is that it also factors in how players perform on the big stage. Unlike the other candidates, Ingram stepped up in a huge game against Florida when most of the nation expected Florida to handle the Crimson Tide. Ingram scored 3 touchdowns and seemed like a man among boys. When you also throw in the fact that he is only a sophomore it makes his performance even more impressive. He's had a solid year the whole way through playing for the top team in the nation this year. For these reasons, he is my Heisman winner.
I'll agree with you that Ingram did well when it counted, but so did Gerhart. Against USC, when they were ranked #9, Gerhart ran for over 175 yards and three touchdowns. Nobody saw that coming. Against Notre Shame he ran for over 200 yards and three scores. Ok, maybe that isn't the best argument, but it was a primetime, Nationally Televised game. I see where you're coming from with Ingram but Gerhart accounted for 14.5 points per game while Ingram only accounted for 10.8 (Which is less than BG's Freddie Barnes who got screwed out of the Biletnikoff). At least we both agree that Tim Tebow is NOT the winner.
I think that Suh should win the Heisman based on the fact that he has been the most dominant player at his position and on his team all year. Arguments can be made about each of the other four finalists as well. Ingram had a great game in his biggest game, but had just average games in other huge games, even going out injured against Auburn and having his backup run for 125 and TD, showing maybe its the offensive line, not Ingram. Gerhart has also been dominate, but also had some down games, 86 in a loss at Wake Forest and 92 in a loss at Oregon State. I am not saying either of these guys should not win the Heisman, I am saying they are too close and to similar to separate and one does not dominate the other like Reggie Bush (as much as I hate him) dominated all other RB's the year he won (Vince Young should have won). Suh has disrupted teams since day one and even in losses has been unblockable. For a DT to have 12 sacks and 82 Tackles is Warren Sapp like (not Oakland Sapp more like Thug U Sapp, who also was the last DT to finish in top 5 of Heisman voting). Suh dominated on the biggest stage with 4.5 sacks of McCoy in the Big XII Title Game. The QB's are just there to be there. McCoy had a shot but didn't play well in Texas' biggest games (Okla - Nebraska). Tebow has one and does not need his ego inflated any more. Suh is my pick for the domination and things I saw when I watched not only the Big XII Title Game but also the Cornhuskers game against Mizzou. In the game against Virginia Tech, he just ate up two to three blockers at a time, and never was there any doubt who the best player on the field was each game. Give it to a boy named Suh.
I just can't go for Suh who is five sacks behind the leader in sacks. And I realize he's not expected to get a ton of tackles but he only had 82 on the year and almost half of them were assisted. If he was leading the nation in sacks and had his team in a position to win a championship I could see him getting it more.
He jumps off the game film as a standout, a player who creates and makes his team better. Nebraska is not a top 15 Defense without him...Alabama could be a top 15 rushing Offense without Ingram and Stanford the same without Gerhart, both have very capable freshman behind them who played great this season.
I feel that the award should go to Stanford's Toby Gerhart. Not only does he lead the nation in Carries,Yards and Touchdowns, he's also averaging over 5.5 yards per carry. The numbers don't lie and Toby Gerhart should be striking the pose Saturday evening.
In my opinion all of the candidates are worthy of a shot at the Heisman but the one who stands out the most for me is Mark Ingram. I think what is special about this award is that it also factors in how players perform on the big stage. Unlike the other candidates, Ingram stepped up in a huge game against Florida when most of the nation expected Florida to handle the Crimson Tide. Ingram scored 3 touchdowns and seemed like a man among boys. When you also throw in the fact that he is only a sophomore it makes his performance even more impressive. He's had a solid year the whole way through playing for the top team in the nation this year. For these reasons, he is my Heisman winner.
I'll agree with you that Ingram did well when it counted, but so did Gerhart. Against USC, when they were ranked #9, Gerhart ran for over 175 yards and three touchdowns. Nobody saw that coming. Against Notre Shame he ran for over 200 yards and three scores. Ok, maybe that isn't the best argument, but it was a primetime, Nationally Televised game. I see where you're coming from with Ingram but Gerhart accounted for 14.5 points per game while Ingram only accounted for 10.8 (Which is less than BG's Freddie Barnes who got screwed out of the Biletnikoff). At least we both agree that Tim Tebow is NOT the winner.
I think that Suh should win the Heisman based on the fact that he has been the most dominant player at his position and on his team all year. Arguments can be made about each of the other four finalists as well. Ingram had a great game in his biggest game, but had just average games in other huge games, even going out injured against Auburn and having his backup run for 125 and TD, showing maybe its the offensive line, not Ingram. Gerhart has also been dominate, but also had some down games, 86 in a loss at Wake Forest and 92 in a loss at Oregon State. I am not saying either of these guys should not win the Heisman, I am saying they are too close and to similar to separate and one does not dominate the other like Reggie Bush (as much as I hate him) dominated all other RB's the year he won (Vince Young should have won). Suh has disrupted teams since day one and even in losses has been unblockable. For a DT to have 12 sacks and 82 Tackles is Warren Sapp like (not Oakland Sapp more like Thug U Sapp, who also was the last DT to finish in top 5 of Heisman voting). Suh dominated on the biggest stage with 4.5 sacks of McCoy in the Big XII Title Game. The QB's are just there to be there. McCoy had a shot but didn't play well in Texas' biggest games (Okla - Nebraska). Tebow has one and does not need his ego inflated any more. Suh is my pick for the domination and things I saw when I watched not only the Big XII Title Game but also the Cornhuskers game against Mizzou. In the game against Virginia Tech, he just ate up two to three blockers at a time, and never was there any doubt who the best player on the field was each game. Give it to a boy named Suh.
I just can't go for Suh who is five sacks behind the leader in sacks. And I realize he's not expected to get a ton of tackles but he only had 82 on the year and almost half of them were assisted. If he was leading the nation in sacks and had his team in a position to win a championship I could see him getting it more.
He jumps off the game film as a standout, a player who creates and makes his team better. Nebraska is not a top 15 Defense without him...Alabama could be a top 15 rushing Offense without Ingram and Stanford the same without Gerhart, both have very capable freshman behind them who played great this season.
I think these are all good statements and perhaps true, however, history shows that there's no way a DT will win the award. I think that the fact that Nebraska's defense fell short at the end of that game and lost will also seal his fate. The best player on the best team usually gets the award. With that said it's going to come down to McCoy and Ingram. I think this is one of the rare years where no matter who wins you could make a legitimate argument for that player. (Except for maybe Tebow because anyone who cries after a loss is immediately disqualified in my eyes.)
So there you have it. Plenty of different views from three different people. Is one of them right? Are all of them wrong? I guess we'll just have to wait and see!
Friday, November 13, 2009
LeBron James 2010: Cleveland? NYC? LA???
This week Jason and I will discuss the impending Free Agency of LeBron James. Here's what Jason had to say...
So I've been hearing all this talk about LeBron James being a free agent at the end of the season and all the speculation about where he might go. Will it be with Kobe and the Lakers? Will it be the Big Apple? I've even heard Chicago mentioned once. Listen...he's not leaving. At least not yet. Why would he? LeBron is a business man and it is smart for him to not take Cleveland's preliminary offer because it gives him leverage, a chance to be treated like royalty all summer (not like he isn't pampered already). But that leads to my next point, Cleveland treats him like he walks on water. Dan Gilbert can offer him the MAX contract and right now Cleveland is his best chance to cement his legacy with a true title. He won't go to New York because they are terrible, even if they get Dwyane Wade they are still not going to be an elite team. He won't go to the Lakers because that is Kobe's team and, as unselfish as LeBron is, he will want to be the man. Chicago is just ridiculous. Plain and simple he will re-sign the maximum contract with Cleveland for about 2 or 3 years. If they don't win in that time frame he will leave but not until then. He loves the area, he loves the royalty treatment and he wants to win. Those three factors equal him staying. Cleveland fans and even the media will portray it as "This always happens to Cleveland" in terms of him leaving but I honestly believe this is totally different because we actually have an owner who has a ton of money and cares. We've only ever had one or the other in the past with our pro sports teams owners. Dick Jacobs was probably the best sports owner we've had here in the last 20 years. He spent what he could but his budget was not that of a Steinbrenner. Gilbert could very well be the most passionate, intelligent, and championship hungry owners in the NBA. He knows his franchise is worth nothing without King James. He will do whatever it takes to keep him here. Trust me...
I do trust you Jason, I really do. LeBron James will be a Cleveland Cavalier for at LEAST 2 more seasons. I think what frustrates me most about the whole situation is the fact that no one thinks that LeBron can win in Cleveland. Why? Because of our history? Ever since LeBron got here things have been looking up for Cleveland. The Cavs have gotten better each year, the Indians almost made it to the World Series and the Browns...well, let's just stop at "the Indians almost made it to the World Series." Anyways, back to the point, I think it is absolutely wrong to think that Cleveland can't attract another big star to help LeBron. Last night, during the game against Miami, I believe it was Reggie Miller that said "How about Wade and LeBron playing together in Cleveland?" and someone replied that there was no chance of that at all. Why not? If Dan Gilbert wants to spend the coin to make Cleveland a powerhouse, why wouldn't players do it? As much as the city of Cleveland has been down, it is starting to rise again and Dan Gilbert is a big reason for it. The city of Cleveland earns about One Million Dollars every time the Cavs play a home game. Ohio just passed an Issue to bring Casinos into Cleveland and Dan Gilbert is going to run one of them. Cleveland is a city that is getting ready to rise from the ashes and a Championship in ANY sport will be one of the steps that helps. The Cavs give LeBron the best chance to win AND be the man running the show. And as for another star coming to Cleveland, I think we could see that happen near the trading deadline.
I did hear that comment from Reggie Miller and the response. It further makes me believe that sports journalism has gone the way of rumor central. It's no fun for them to speculate that small market teams could be big time contenders. Now I don't think Wade would go to Cleveland but it's not beyond possibility that Cleveland could attract another big name. I think people ignore what Gilbert is doing simply because it's never been done here before. Gilbert is definitely a strong asset to this area for all the reasons you list and we should have faith in what he can accomplish. He won't let us down without a fight, which is more than we can say about the other "owners" of this city.
Exactly. Dolan and Lerner don't know anything about the sports in which they own a team. They just don't get it. Lerner seems like he's starting to get it but we'll have to wait and see. I know that Cleveland doesn't have the Billions that a New York or an LA has but to dub us a "Small Market" is a little off, I think. We have owner's with big bucks...don't let the Indians payroll fool you...and two of them (Gilbert and Lerner) are willing to spend it. Lerner just needs to learn how to spend it properly. I do believe that I will see a World Series Championship, an NBA Championship and a Super Bowl Title in my lifetime. I'm not saying I won't be on my death bed when it happens, but it WILL happen.
So I've been hearing all this talk about LeBron James being a free agent at the end of the season and all the speculation about where he might go. Will it be with Kobe and the Lakers? Will it be the Big Apple? I've even heard Chicago mentioned once. Listen...he's not leaving. At least not yet. Why would he? LeBron is a business man and it is smart for him to not take Cleveland's preliminary offer because it gives him leverage, a chance to be treated like royalty all summer (not like he isn't pampered already). But that leads to my next point, Cleveland treats him like he walks on water. Dan Gilbert can offer him the MAX contract and right now Cleveland is his best chance to cement his legacy with a true title. He won't go to New York because they are terrible, even if they get Dwyane Wade they are still not going to be an elite team. He won't go to the Lakers because that is Kobe's team and, as unselfish as LeBron is, he will want to be the man. Chicago is just ridiculous. Plain and simple he will re-sign the maximum contract with Cleveland for about 2 or 3 years. If they don't win in that time frame he will leave but not until then. He loves the area, he loves the royalty treatment and he wants to win. Those three factors equal him staying. Cleveland fans and even the media will portray it as "This always happens to Cleveland" in terms of him leaving but I honestly believe this is totally different because we actually have an owner who has a ton of money and cares. We've only ever had one or the other in the past with our pro sports teams owners. Dick Jacobs was probably the best sports owner we've had here in the last 20 years. He spent what he could but his budget was not that of a Steinbrenner. Gilbert could very well be the most passionate, intelligent, and championship hungry owners in the NBA. He knows his franchise is worth nothing without King James. He will do whatever it takes to keep him here. Trust me...
I do trust you Jason, I really do. LeBron James will be a Cleveland Cavalier for at LEAST 2 more seasons. I think what frustrates me most about the whole situation is the fact that no one thinks that LeBron can win in Cleveland. Why? Because of our history? Ever since LeBron got here things have been looking up for Cleveland. The Cavs have gotten better each year, the Indians almost made it to the World Series and the Browns...well, let's just stop at "the Indians almost made it to the World Series." Anyways, back to the point, I think it is absolutely wrong to think that Cleveland can't attract another big star to help LeBron. Last night, during the game against Miami, I believe it was Reggie Miller that said "How about Wade and LeBron playing together in Cleveland?" and someone replied that there was no chance of that at all. Why not? If Dan Gilbert wants to spend the coin to make Cleveland a powerhouse, why wouldn't players do it? As much as the city of Cleveland has been down, it is starting to rise again and Dan Gilbert is a big reason for it. The city of Cleveland earns about One Million Dollars every time the Cavs play a home game. Ohio just passed an Issue to bring Casinos into Cleveland and Dan Gilbert is going to run one of them. Cleveland is a city that is getting ready to rise from the ashes and a Championship in ANY sport will be one of the steps that helps. The Cavs give LeBron the best chance to win AND be the man running the show. And as for another star coming to Cleveland, I think we could see that happen near the trading deadline.
I did hear that comment from Reggie Miller and the response. It further makes me believe that sports journalism has gone the way of rumor central. It's no fun for them to speculate that small market teams could be big time contenders. Now I don't think Wade would go to Cleveland but it's not beyond possibility that Cleveland could attract another big name. I think people ignore what Gilbert is doing simply because it's never been done here before. Gilbert is definitely a strong asset to this area for all the reasons you list and we should have faith in what he can accomplish. He won't let us down without a fight, which is more than we can say about the other "owners" of this city.
Exactly. Dolan and Lerner don't know anything about the sports in which they own a team. They just don't get it. Lerner seems like he's starting to get it but we'll have to wait and see. I know that Cleveland doesn't have the Billions that a New York or an LA has but to dub us a "Small Market" is a little off, I think. We have owner's with big bucks...don't let the Indians payroll fool you...and two of them (Gilbert and Lerner) are willing to spend it. Lerner just needs to learn how to spend it properly. I do believe that I will see a World Series Championship, an NBA Championship and a Super Bowl Title in my lifetime. I'm not saying I won't be on my death bed when it happens, but it WILL happen.
Friday, November 6, 2009
Heads or Tails Debates: College Bowl-ing
Welcome to Heads or Tails Debates. Our first topic in this new blog will be the College Football Bowl Game situation. Everything that Matthew writes will be in Orange while everything Jason writes will be in Brown. We hope you enjoy or takes!
I think it is definitely time for Division 1-A, or whatever you want to call it, to go to a playoff system rather than having one single bowl game and a flawed ranking system decide College Football's National Championship. The BCS is a monopoly that punishes schools who are not in one of the, so-called, elite conferences. Last time I saw, Boise State had beaten a few of the teams from the "elite" conferences.
It is ridiculous that Division 1-A football does not have a playoff system not just because of the flawed rankings but also because of the lost revenue. It's commonly said that they will not change because of sponsor commitments and bowl game traditions. Well here's an idea I came up with when I was about 12 years old. Have 12 teams make the playoffs. Hold each round in a neutral location (bowl game spots with bowl game sponsors). People will say "the fans won't travel" or "you'll lose attendance." Not true. The NCAA basketball tourney does the same thing and they have been running strong for years. Most bowl games are played in warm weather areas so you could alternate locations but still keep them near to each proceeding round. Fans (especially student fans) will travel regardless. If this is flawed then fine change it but I say at least give it a try, it can't be worse than what we have now. Also, this helps teams like Boise State because now big schools won't shy away from playing them for fear of losing points in the BCS rankings. Seems we both agree on this one...CHANGE THE SYSTEM!
I do agree with you on most of what you're saying. The first thing I disagree with is your 12 team theory. Why so few? That gives some teams byes in the first round. Nobody in basketball gets a bye. Also, that would be only five bowl games. That's exactly what the BCS already offers. I don't know about fan travel either. Yeah, your die hard fans will get to all the games but do you really think the students would be able to afford to go to six bowl games? I don't see this as very likely. But the stadiums will be full no matter what. Either way, the ranking system needs to be changed. How did Boise not pass TCU in the rankings after the Oregon team they beat throttled USC? The computers aren't as smart as we think they are.
Well there are numerous options that could be used that would be better than BCS. Even playing games at home stadiums is better. My thought on 12 is there usually aren't more than that many teams that are considered "championship calibur" so it cuts down on time. Part of the issue is the time between the end of the regular season and the start of the bowls is finals time. Officials say that a playoff would take too long.
I think it is definitely time for Division 1-A, or whatever you want to call it, to go to a playoff system rather than having one single bowl game and a flawed ranking system decide College Football's National Championship. The BCS is a monopoly that punishes schools who are not in one of the, so-called, elite conferences. Last time I saw, Boise State had beaten a few of the teams from the "elite" conferences.
It is ridiculous that Division 1-A football does not have a playoff system not just because of the flawed rankings but also because of the lost revenue. It's commonly said that they will not change because of sponsor commitments and bowl game traditions. Well here's an idea I came up with when I was about 12 years old. Have 12 teams make the playoffs. Hold each round in a neutral location (bowl game spots with bowl game sponsors). People will say "the fans won't travel" or "you'll lose attendance." Not true. The NCAA basketball tourney does the same thing and they have been running strong for years. Most bowl games are played in warm weather areas so you could alternate locations but still keep them near to each proceeding round. Fans (especially student fans) will travel regardless. If this is flawed then fine change it but I say at least give it a try, it can't be worse than what we have now. Also, this helps teams like Boise State because now big schools won't shy away from playing them for fear of losing points in the BCS rankings. Seems we both agree on this one...CHANGE THE SYSTEM!
I do agree with you on most of what you're saying. The first thing I disagree with is your 12 team theory. Why so few? That gives some teams byes in the first round. Nobody in basketball gets a bye. Also, that would be only five bowl games. That's exactly what the BCS already offers. I don't know about fan travel either. Yeah, your die hard fans will get to all the games but do you really think the students would be able to afford to go to six bowl games? I don't see this as very likely. But the stadiums will be full no matter what. Either way, the ranking system needs to be changed. How did Boise not pass TCU in the rankings after the Oregon team they beat throttled USC? The computers aren't as smart as we think they are.
Well there are numerous options that could be used that would be better than BCS. Even playing games at home stadiums is better. My thought on 12 is there usually aren't more than that many teams that are considered "championship calibur" so it cuts down on time. Part of the issue is the time between the end of the regular season and the start of the bowls is finals time. Officials say that a playoff would take too long.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)